7.5% of Wake Forest University's Anthropology course descriptions are framed from the left. Across all 100 schools' Anthropology departments, it is 10.4%.
0%45%
Wake Forest University: 7.5% Anthropology at all 100 schools: 10.4% each other school in the comparison
4 plotted courses (the ones with a political subject). 100 = far left, 50 = the average American, 0 = far right. Subject places what a course studies, not the side it takes.
Subject places what a course studies, not the side it takes. A course on slavery or the Holocaust lands far right and a course on Marx or the Soviet Union lands far left, whether the course praises, criticizes or simply describes it.
Furthest-left subjects
ANT 329 · Anthropology of Gender and Sexuality.75
Anthropology
Examines cultural constructions of gender from a cross-cultural perspective and the relationship between feminism and anthropology through time. Emphasizes how varied forms of feminisms are constituted within diverse social, cultural, and…
ANT 325 · Roots of Racism: Race and Ethnic Diversity in the U.S..73
Anthropology
Examines biological myths of race and race as a social construction; historical, economic, and political roots of inequalities; institutions and iedologies that buttress and challenge power relations; and implications of anthropological…
ANT 350 · Language, Indigeneity and Globalization.72
Anthropology
Taking a global case-study approach, this seminar explores the role language plays in contemporary identity formation and expression, from indigenous to transnational contexts. Addresses relationships among language and colonialism,…
None. Wake Forest University Anthropology has 4 courses with a left-of-center subject and not one with a right-of-center subject.
Why this number, in plain words
Share of courses described from the left. Percent of all courses in the group whose Framing reading is leftward: the description frames its subject one-sidedly to the left.
Counted: all courses in the group, including N and I. No interval is published for this number.
Readings are of catalog description text, not of teaching, syllabi or individual professors.
Right-framed courses are almost absent (33 of 124,290); this run cannot tell catalog reality from model sensitivity. Compare schools with adjusted_ratio, not this raw share, because department mix differs.