University of Tennessee-Knoxville · Women's & Gender Studies
30.8% of University of Tennessee-Knoxville's Women's & Gender Studies course descriptions are framed from the left. Across all 100 schools' Women's & Gender Studies departments, it is 34.5%.
0%70%
University of Tennessee-Knoxville: 30.8% Women's & Gender Studies at all 100 schools: 34.5% each other school in the comparison
5 plotted courses (the ones with a political subject). 100 = far left, 50 = the average American, 0 = far right. Subject places what a course studies, not the side it takes.
Subject places what a course studies, not the side it takes. A course on slavery or the Holocaust lands far right and a course on Marx or the Soviet Union lands far left, whether the course praises, criticizes or simply describes it.
Furthest-left subjects
WGS 201 · Intro to LGBTQ+ Studies83
Women's & Gender Studies
An interdisciplinary introduction to key concepts and methods in lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender studies, including scholarship on asexuality, intersexuality, and 2SQ (Two-Spirit/Queer) sexualities. Students will examine the history…
Explores issues surrounding sexuality, gender and cinema from points of view of feminist film criticism.(Same as CNST 469 .)Satisfies Volunteer Core Requirement: (GCUS)
None. University of Tennessee-Knoxville Women's & Gender Studies has 5 courses with a left-of-center subject and not one with a right-of-center subject.
Why this number, in plain words
Share of courses described from the left. Percent of all courses in the group whose Framing reading is leftward: the description frames its subject one-sidedly to the left.
Counted: all courses in the group, including N and I. No interval is published for this number.
Readings are of catalog description text, not of teaching, syllabi or individual professors.
Details: exact rows, definitions and method
Name
Metric
Value
95% interval
n
scored
University of Tennessee-Knoxville · Women's & Gender Studies
Right-framed courses are almost absent (33 of 124,290); this run cannot tell catalog reality from model sensitivity. Compare schools with adjusted_ratio, not this raw share, because department mix differs.