2.6% of George Washington University's Philosophy course descriptions are framed from the left. Across all 100 schools' Philosophy departments, it is 2.7%.
0%20%
George Washington University: 2.6% Philosophy at all 100 schools: 2.7% each other school in the comparison
Underlined: words the model quoted from the description when we asked it, after scoring, to explain its score.
Furthest left
PHIL 2125W · Philosophy of Race and Gender72
Philosophy
A theoretical examination of the bodily, social, discursive, and political effects of patriarchy, racism, and classism. Includes a significant engagement in writing as a form of critical inquiry and scholarly expression to satisfy the WID requirement.
Differing theoretical perspectives on how race, sexuality, gender, class, and ethnicity inform (and re-form) individual as well as group identities; consequences of being marginalized because one is associated with an allegedly inferior race, sex, and/or gender.
None. George Washington University Philosophy has 2 left-framed courses and not one right-framed course.
Why this number, in plain words
Share of courses described from the left. Percent of all courses in the group whose Framing reading is leftward: the description frames its subject one-sidedly to the left.
Counted: all courses in the group, including N and I. No interval is published for this number.
Readings are of catalog description text, not of teaching, syllabi or individual professors.
Right-framed courses are almost absent (33 of 124,290); this run cannot tell catalog reality from model sensitivity. Compare schools with adjusted_ratio, not this raw share, because department mix differs.