Claremont McKenna College · Ethnic & African American Studies
40% of Claremont McKenna College's Ethnic & African American Studies course descriptions are framed from the left. Across all 100 schools' Ethnic & African American Studies departments, it is 24.7%.
0%75%
Claremont McKenna College: 40% Ethnic & African American Studies at all 100 schools: 24.7% each other school in the comparison
Underlined: words the model quoted from the description when we asked it, after scoring, to explain its score.
Furthest left
AFRI 125 · Afro-Pessimism and the Politics of Hope78
Ethnic & African American Studies
This course will survey the deep and dark history of dreams, accomplishments and roadblocks that have constituted and continue to influence the ways Blacks in America negotiate a compromised political position. Traversing history from the…
This course explores how media representations of Asian women track US domestic and foreign policy from the anti-Chinese xenophobia of the 19th century to the "model minority" or wealthy globetrotter of the present and how these images…
Philosophical thought and the philosophical cannon cannot be restricted to the 'great thinkers' of western history. This course will be a general introduction to Africana Philosophy. We will unveil not only that philosophy is more than the…
None. Claremont McKenna College Ethnic & African American Studies has 4 left-framed courses and not one right-framed course.
Why this number, in plain words
Share of courses described from the left. Percent of all courses in the group whose Framing reading is leftward: the description frames its subject one-sidedly to the left.
Counted: all courses in the group, including N and I. No interval is published for this number.
Readings are of catalog description text, not of teaching, syllabi or individual professors.
Details: exact rows, definitions and method
Name
Metric
Value
95% interval
n
scored
Claremont McKenna College · Ethnic & African American Studies
Right-framed courses are almost absent (33 of 124,290); this run cannot tell catalog reality from model sensitivity. Compare schools with adjusted_ratio, not this raw share, because department mix differs.